Dynamo - main thread
Re: Dynamo - main thread
If you can put the logs in this hand?
Maybe he didn't recognize the Final Table.
Maybe he didn't recognize the Final Table.
-
- First blood
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2021 12:15 pm
Re: Dynamo - main thread
I don't know what you mean I didn't even know he could recognize the final table but I can guarantee you that it was a very bad hand that after seeing the flop with face cards and having only 77 in hand was a stupid move
-
- First blood
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2021 12:15 pm
Re: Dynamo - main thread
Do you also use Dynamo in the final stages without playing manual?
Re: Dynamo - main thread
It depends, I already left him alone at the final table, but I have also already taken control to be sure to finish 1st when the price is relatively high.
-
- First blood
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2021 12:15 pm
Re: Dynamo - main thread
A question but are you happy to use it also on mmt with tables of 6?
Re: Dynamo - main thread
I had more or less similar results whether in 6 or 9 in MTT, so yes.
-
- First blood
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2021 12:15 pm
Re: Dynamo - main thread
I was wondering why I find it much more aggressive for 6 turbo tables
Re: Dynamo - main thread
little note from the NASH code.
For the Pusher it's based on the villain's stack, but for the caller it's on his stack, but on the profile it's based only on the villain's stack.
it should be this right?
For the Pusher it's based on the villain's stack, but for the caller it's on his stack, but on the profile it's based only on the villain's stack.
Code: Select all
##f$NashCaller##
[ hand$AA AND EffectiveMaxStacksizeOfActiveOpponents <= 20 ] ? 1 :
[ hand$AKsuited AND EffectiveMaxStacksizeOfActiveOpponents <= 20 ] ? 1 :
Code: Select all
##f$NashCaller##
[ hand$AA AND StackSize <= 20 ] ? 1 :
[ hand$AKsuited AND StackSize <= 20 ] ? 1 :
Re: Dynamo - main thread
Merry Christmas, guys and gals. I'm sorry to have left you guys for such a long time. To be perfectly honest, I was spending a ton of time on development that I started to notice that other parts of my life were suffering. Plus, some of the users were experiencing downswings (which is actually a natural occurrence in the game of chance). The frustrations experienced by users is really just a difference in play style, now that I think about it. However, it took a toll on my perspective about why I was spending an exorbitant amount of time writing/testing code while not really making any strides in my profession and quality of life for my family. Unbeknownst to most of you guys, I tested my bot live. This is because I wanted to make sure that the bot would perform well when there were real world implications. What's the point of coding a bot that play well in freerolls, but not in actual $ tournaments? In the process, I initially spent a ton of money getting the bot to play better poker. For the most part, I broke even (bot sales and poker winnings combined minus beta-testing losses)... so I didn't have much to show for my efforts. This is where I was forced to draw the line. Since then, I've been working on multiple other projects to increase my cashflow (grew my main business and added a new passive business venture in crypto mining). I'm thinking about getting back into the mix of botting again, but I'm not fully convinced that I'll have a better experience this time around... in any case, I wanted to explain my situation a bit and also wanted to wish everyone a merry Christmas.
“Life is not always a matter of holding good cards, but sometimes, playing a poor hand well.” ― Jack London
Re: Dynamo - main thread
good morning
I would like to see soon a review of your profile, thanks
Cheers
I would like to see soon a review of your profile, thanks
Cheers